State v. Bishop

378 A.2d 1075, 119 R.I. 917, 1977 R.I. LEXIS 2083
Supreme Court of Rhode Island·Decided September 30, 1977·No. M. P. No. 77-293·Published

Opinion

In this petition for writ of certiorari, the petitioner cites In re Caldarone, 115 R.I. 316, 345 A.2d 871 (1975). However, in the present case, contrary to the facts in Caldarone, an appeal was filed. Accordingly, the petition for certiorari is denied.

This denial is without prejudice to the petitioner’s filing a motion in this court under Rule 11(c) showing that the inability of the petitioner to cause timely transmission of the [918]*918record, for two years, was due to causes beyond his control or to circumstances which may be deemed excusable neglect.

Julius C. Michaelson, Attorney General, Nancy Marks Rahmes, Special Assistant Attorney General, for plaintiff-respondent. Bevilacqua ér Cicilline, John F. Cicilline, for defendant-petitioner. Chief Justice Bevilacqua did not participate.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Bishop, 378 A.2d 1075, 119 R.I. 917, 1977 R.I. LEXIS 2083 (R.I. 1977).

378 A.2d 1075 (State v. Bishop) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Re Caldarone
345 A.2d 871 (Supreme Court of Rhode Island, 1975)