State v. Bishop
Opinion
In this petition for writ of certiorari, the petitioner cites In re Caldarone, 115 R.I. 316, 345 A.2d 871 (1975). However, in the present case, contrary to the facts in Caldarone, an appeal was filed. Accordingly, the petition for certiorari is denied.
This denial is without prejudice to the petitioner’s filing a motion in this court under Rule 11(c) showing that the inability of the petitioner to cause timely transmission of the [918]*918record, for two years, was due to causes beyond his control or to circumstances which may be deemed excusable neglect.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
378 A.2d 1075 (State v. Bishop) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.