State v. Bischoff

207 A.3d 28, 331 Conn. 926
CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut
DecidedMay 8, 2019
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 207 A.3d 28 (State v. Bischoff) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Bischoff, 207 A.3d 28, 331 Conn. 926 (Colo. 2019).

Opinion

The defendant's petition for certification to appeal from the Appellate Court, 189 Conn. App. 119, 206 A.3d 253 (2019), is granted, limited to the following issues:

"1. Did the Appellate Court properly determine, in State v. Moore, 180 Conn. App. 116, 182 A.3d 696, cert. denied, 329 Conn. 905, 185 A.3d 595 (2018), that Public Acts 2015, No. 15-2, § 1 (P.A. 15-2), does not have retroactive effect?

"2. If the answer to the first certified question is 'no,' should this court overrule the retroactivity analysis contained in State v. Kalil, 314 Conn. 529, 552, 107 A.3d 343 (2014), and apply the amelioration doctrine to give retroactive effect to P.A. 15-2, § 1?"

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Bischoff
337 Conn. 739 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2021)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
207 A.3d 28, 331 Conn. 926, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-bischoff-conn-2019.