State v. Bischoff

Supreme Court of Connecticut

State v. Bischoff

207 A.3d 28, 331 Conn. 926

Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided May 8, 2019·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

The defendant's petition for certification to appeal from the Appellate Court, 189 Conn. App. 119, 206 A.3d 253 (2019), is granted, limited to the following issues:

"1. Did the Appellate Court properly determine, in State v. Moore, 180 Conn. App. 116, 182 A.3d 696, cert. denied, 329 Conn. 905, 185 A.3d 595 (2018), that Public Acts 2015, No. 15-2, § 1 (P.A. 15-2), does not have retroactive effect?

"2. If the answer to the first certified question is 'no,' should this court overrule the retroactivity analysis contained in State v. Kalil, 314 Conn. 529, 552, 107 A.3d 343 (2014), and apply the amelioration doctrine to give retroactive effect to P.A. 15-2, § 1?"

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The defendant's petition for certification to appeal from the Appellate Court, 189 Conn. App. 119, 206 A.3d 253 (2019), is granted, limited to the following issues:

"1. Did the Appellate Court properly determine, in State v. Moore, 180 Conn. App. 116, 182 A.3d 696, cert. denied, 329 Conn. 905, 185 A.3d 595 (2018), that Public Acts 2015, No. 15-2, § 1 (P.A. 15-2), does not have retroactive effect?

"2. If the answer to the first certified question is 'no,' should this court overrule the retroactivity analysis contained in State v. Kalil, 314 Conn. 529, 552, 107 A.3d 343 (2014), and apply the amelioration doctrine to give retroactive effect to P.A. 15-2, § 1?"

State v. Bischoff, 207 A.3d 28, 331 Conn. 926 (Colo. 2019).

Pincite

207 A.3d 28 (State v. Bischoff) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related