State v. Birmingham
356 S.W.3d 880, 2012 WL 117938, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 57
Opinion
ORDER
Mr. Terry Birmingham appeals his convictions of forcible rape, first-degree assault, and first-degree burglary. Mr. Birmingham argues the admission of certain hearsay was a violation of his rights under the Confrontation Clause.
*881 For reasons stated in the memorandum provided to the parties, we affirm. Rule 30.25(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Birmingham, 356 S.W.3d 880, 2012 WL 117938, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 57 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012).
356 S.W.3d 880 (State v. Birmingham) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. WHITH
356 S.W.3d 880 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2012)