State v. Birmingham
356 S.W.3d 880, 2012 WL 117938, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 57
This text of 356 S.W.3d 880 (State v. Birmingham) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
State v. Birmingham, 356 S.W.3d 880, 2012 WL 117938, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 57 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012).
Opinion
ORDER
Mr. Terry Birmingham appeals his convictions of forcible rape, first-degree assault, and first-degree burglary. Mr. Birmingham argues the admission of certain hearsay was a violation of his rights under the Confrontation Clause.
*881 For reasons stated in the memorandum provided to the parties, we affirm. Rule 30.25(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
State v. WHITH
356 S.W.3d 880 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2012)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
356 S.W.3d 880, 2012 WL 117938, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 57, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-birmingham-moctapp-2012.