State v. Bird

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

State v. Bird

31 S.C.L. 99

DecidedDecember 15, 1845

StatusPublished

This text of 31 S.C.L. 99 (State v. Bird) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Bird, 31 S.C.L. 99 (S.C. Ct. App. 1845).

Pincite

Opinion

Curia, per Butler, J.

Under the authority of the case of Lowndes vs. Pinckney, 1 Rich. Eq. 155, we think the postea should be awarded to the plaintiff, not only for the sum of two hundred and twenty six dollars and forty cents, as directed by the circuit Judge, but also for the sum of two hundred and eighty threee dollars and eighty five cents, together with interest on both of these sums from the time of demand, to wit, the 4th of March, 1842. According to this opinion the motion to modify the judgment below is granted.

Richardson, O’Neall, Evans, Wardlaw and Frost, JJ. concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Curia, per Butler, J.

Under the authority of the case of Lowndes vs. Pinckney, 1 Rich. Eq. 155, we think the postea should be awarded to the plaintiff, not only for the sum of two hundred and twenty six dollars and forty cents, as directed by the circuit Judge, but also for the sum of two hundred and eighty threee dollars and eighty five cents, together with interest on both of these sums from the time of demand, to wit, the 4th of March, 1842. According to this opinion the motion to modify the judgment below is granted.

Richardson, O’Neall, Evans, Wardlaw and Frost, JJ. concurred.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

31 S.C.L. 99, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-bird-scctapp-1845.