State v. Bino
This text of 488 P.3d 815 (State v. Bino) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Submitted June 29, 2020; portion of judgment requiring defendant to pay attorney fees reversed, otherwise affirmed June 16, 2021
STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. ROBERT CONNEL BINO, Defendant-Appellant. Washington County Circuit Court 17CR43966; A169461 488 P3d 815
Oscar Garcia, Judge. Ernest G. Lannet, Chief Defender, Criminal Appellate Section, and Morgen E. Daniels, Deputy Public Defender, Office of Public Defense Services, filed the brief for appellant. Ellen F. Rosenblum, Attorney General, Benjamin Gutman, Solicitor General, and Dashiell L. Farewell, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent. Before Armstrong, Presiding Judge, and Tookey, Judge, and Aoyagi, Judge. PER CURIAM Portion of judgment requiring defendant to pay attorney fees reversed; otherwise affirmed. 448 State v. Bino
PER CURIAM In this criminal appeal of a judgment of conviction for driving under the influence of intoxicants (DUII), ORS 813.010, defendant raises two assignments of error. In the first assignment, defendant argues that the trial court erred when it revoked his DUII diversion. That assignment is not reviewable. State v. Merrill, 311 Or App 487, 492 P3d 722 (2021); ORS 138.105(5). In the second assignment of error, defendant argues that the trial court erred in imposing $400 in court-appointed attorney fees. We agree with defen- dant that the state did not meet its burden of establishing that he had the ability to pay attorney fees, ORS 151.505, ORS 161.665, and that the trial court erred in concluding otherwise. We reverse the attorney-fee award. Portion of judgment requiring defendant to pay attorney fees reversed; otherwise affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
488 P.3d 815, 312 Or. App. 447, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-bino-orctapp-2021.