State v. Binion

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Binion

490 S.W.3d 395, 2016 WL 2994570, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 516

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedMay 24, 2016

DocketED 102937

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 490 S.W.3d 395 (State v. Binion) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Binion, 490 S.W.3d 395, 2016 WL 2994570, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 516 (Mo. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Hydres Binion (“Defendant”) appeals from the trial court’s judgment, following a jury’s guilty verdict, of first degree statutory sodomy, in violation of Section 566.062. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Hydres Binion (“Defendant”) appeals from the trial court’s judgment, following a jury’s guilty verdict, of first degree statutory sodomy, in violation of Section 566.062. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

490 S.W.3d 395, 2016 WL 2994570, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 516, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-binion-moctapp-2016.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack