State v. Binion

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Binion

490 S.W.3d 395, 2016 WL 2994570, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 516

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided May 24, 2016·No. ED 102937·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Hydres Binion (“Defendant”) appeals from the trial court’s judgment, following a jury’s guilty verdict, of first degree statutory sodomy, in violation of Section 566.062. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Hydres Binion (“Defendant”) appeals from the trial court’s judgment, following a jury’s guilty verdict, of first degree statutory sodomy, in violation of Section 566.062. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

State v. Binion, 490 S.W.3d 395, 2016 WL 2994570, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 516 (Mo. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

490 S.W.3d 395 (State v. Binion) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related