State v. Billingsley

1912 OK 112, 120 P. 966, 30 Okla. 705, 1912 Okla. LEXIS 181
CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma
DecidedJanuary 16, 1912
Docket1432
StatusPublished

This text of 1912 OK 112 (State v. Billingsley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Billingsley, 1912 OK 112, 120 P. 966, 30 Okla. 705, 1912 Okla. LEXIS 181 (Okla. 1912).

Opinion

Opinion by

BREWER, C.

The petition in error and transcript of the record in this case was filed in this court February 21, 1910. The plaintiff in error has failed to file any brief in the cause, as required by rule 7 of this court (20 Okla. viii, 95 Pac. vi).

The petition in error should therefore be dismissed for want of prosecution. Hass et al. v. McCampbell, 27 Okla. 290, 111 Pac. 543; Maddin v. McCormick et al., 27 Okla. 778, 117 Pac. 200; McClelland v. Witherall, infra, 119 Pac. 205.

By the Court: It is so ordered.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Maddin v. McCormick
1911 OK 40 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1911)
Hass v. McCampbell, City Clerk
1910 OK 297 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1910)
McClelland v. Witherall
1911 OK 471 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1911)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1912 OK 112, 120 P. 966, 30 Okla. 705, 1912 Okla. LEXIS 181, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-billingsley-okla-1912.