State v. Billingsley

1912 OK 112, 120 P. 966, 30 Okla. 705, 1912 Okla. LEXIS 181
Supreme Court of Oklahoma·Decided January 16, 1912·No. 1432·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

BREWER, C.

The petition in error and transcript of the record in this case was filed in this court February 21, 1910. The plaintiff in error has failed to file any brief in the cause, as required by rule 7 of this court (20 Okla. viii, 95 Pac. vi).

The petition in error should therefore be dismissed for want of prosecution. Hass et al. v. McCampbell, 27 Okla. 290, 111 Pac. 543; Maddin v. McCormick et al., 27 Okla. 778, 117 Pac. 200; McClelland v. Witherall, infra, 119 Pac. 205.

By the Court: It is so ordered.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Billingsley, 1912 OK 112, 120 P. 966, 30 Okla. 705, 1912 Okla. LEXIS 181 (Okla. 1912).

1912 OK 112 (State v. Billingsley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Maddin v. McCormick
1911 OK 40 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1911)
Hass v. McCampbell, City Clerk
1910 OK 297 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1910)
McClelland v. Witherall
1911 OK 471 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1911)