State v. Billie

Florida Circuit Courts

State v. Billie

45 Fla. Supp. 2d 34

CourtCircuit Court for the Judicial Circuits of Florida

DecidedDecember 5, 1990

DocketCase No. 89-234-AC

StatusPublished

This text of 45 Fla. Supp. 2d 34 (State v. Billie) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Circuit Court for the Judicial Circuits of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Billie, 45 Fla. Supp. 2d 34 (Fla. Super. Ct. 1990).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

PER CURIAM.

A motion for discharge was granted for failure to bring the defendant/appellee to trial timely pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.191.

We reverse because a defense requested continuance was improperly [35]*35charged to the State [Rule 3.191(d)(3)]. See State v Brown, 527 So.2d 209 (Fla. 3 DCA 1988).

Because we have reversed for the reasons set forth above, we need not address the other point raised in this appeal.

Reversed and remanded for further proceedings.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION OF THE COURT

PER CURIAM.

A motion for discharge was granted for failure to bring the defendant/appellee to trial timely pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.191.

We reverse because a defense requested continuance was improperly [35]*35charged to the State [Rule 3.191(d)(3)]. See State v Brown, 527 So.2d 209 (Fla. 3 DCA 1988).

Because we have reversed for the reasons set forth above, we need not address the other point raised in this appeal.

Reversed and remanded for further proceedings.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

45 Fla. Supp. 2d 34, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-billie-flacirct-1990.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack