State v. Billie
717 A.2d 231, 244 Conn. 933
This text of 717 A.2d 231 (State v. Billie) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
State v. Billie, 717 A.2d 231, 244 Conn. 933 (Colo. 1998).
Opinion
The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal and the cross petition by the state of Connecticut for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 47 Conn. App. 678 (AC 15347), is granted, limited to the following issues:
“1. Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the trial court abused its discretion in striking the testimony of the defendant’s expert witness regarding the substance known as ‘illy’ and its effects?
“2. If the answer to question one is yes, did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the trial court’s error was harmless?”
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
State v. Billie
738 A.2d 586 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1999)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
717 A.2d 231, 244 Conn. 933, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-billie-conn-1998.