State v. Billie

717 A.2d 231, 244 Conn. 933
Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided March 7, 1998·No. SC 15929·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal and the cross petition by the state of Connecticut for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 47 Conn. App. 678 (AC 15347), is granted, limited to the following issues:

“1. Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the trial court abused its discretion in striking the testimony of the defendant’s expert witness regarding the substance known as ‘illy’ and its effects?
“2. If the answer to question one is yes, did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the trial court’s error was harmless?”
James B. Streeto, special public defender, in support of the petition. John A. East III, assistant state’s attorney, in opposition. John A. East III, assistant state’s attorney, in support of cross petition. Decided March 7, 1998

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Billie, 717 A.2d 231, 244 Conn. 933 (Colo. 1998).

717 A.2d 231 (State v. Billie) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Billie
738 A.2d 586 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1999)