State v. . Biggerstaff
This text of 119 S.E. 171 (State v. . Biggerstaff) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Defendant relies entirely upon his demurrer to the evidence and motion for dismissal, or for judgment as of nonsuit under O. S., 4643. Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the State, the accepted position on a motion of this hind (S. v. Rountree, 181 N. C., 535), we think the trial court was justified in submitting the case to the jury, and that the verdict is fully supported by the evidence.
No benefit would be derived from detailing the testimony of the several witnesses, as the only question before us is whether it is sufficient to carry the case to the jury, and we think it is.
No error.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
119 S.E. 171, 186 N.C. 784, 1923 N.C. LEXIS 366, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-biggerstaff-nc-1923.