State v. Bigelow
69 P.3d 786, 187 Or. App. 715, 2003 Ore. App. LEXIS 615
Opinion
Defendant appeals the sentence imposed after he pled guilty to theft by receiving. ORS 164.055(l)(c). We reject most of his arguments without discussion. The state concedes that the trial court erred by imposing restitution for items that defendant returned to the victim, and we agree.
Order of restitution vacated; remanded for resent-encing; otherwise affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Bigelow, 69 P.3d 786, 187 Or. App. 715, 2003 Ore. App. LEXIS 615 (Or. Ct. App. 2003).
69 P.3d 786 (State v. Bigelow) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
§ 164.055
Oregon § 164.055