State v. Bigelow
69 P.3d 786, 187 Or. App. 715, 2003 Ore. App. LEXIS 615
This text of 69 P.3d 786 (State v. Bigelow) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
State v. Bigelow, 69 P.3d 786, 187 Or. App. 715, 2003 Ore. App. LEXIS 615 (Or. Ct. App. 2003).
Opinion
Defendant appeals the sentence imposed after he pled guilty to theft by receiving. ORS 164.055(l)(c). We reject most of his arguments without discussion. The state concedes that the trial court erred by imposing restitution for items that defendant returned to the victim, and we agree.
Order of restitution vacated; remanded for resent-encing; otherwise affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
§ 164.055
Oregon § 164.055
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
69 P.3d 786, 187 Or. App. 715, 2003 Ore. App. LEXIS 615, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-bigelow-orctapp-2003.