State v. Biederstedt

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

State v. Biederstedt

367 N.W.2d 84, 1985 Minn. App. LEXIS 4118

CourtCourt of Appeals of Minnesota

DecidedApril 30, 1985

DocketC8-85-394

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 367 N.W.2d 84 (State v. Biederstedt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Biederstedt, 367 N.W.2d 84, 1985 Minn. App. LEXIS 4118 (Mich. Ct. App. 1985).

Pincite

Opinion

SUMMARY OPINION

LESLIE, Judge.

FACTS

Respondent John Biederstedt pleaded guilty to aggravated robbery, Minn.Stat. *85 § 609.245 (1982), of a convenience store in Willmar, Minnesota. In State v. Ritt, 363 N.W.2d 908 (Minn.Ct.App.1985), this court upheld the dispositional departure of Bied-erstedt’s accomplice in that same offense.

DECISION

The trial court based its departure on Biederstedt’s amenability to probation. As in Ritt, the record supports our determination that the court did not abuse its discretion in its departure. See State v. Olson, 325 N.W.2d 13 (Minn.1982); State v. Trog, 323 N.W.2d 28 (Minn.1982).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI