State v. Biederstedt

367 N.W.2d 84, 1985 Minn. App. LEXIS 4118
Court of Appeals of Minnesota·Decided April 30, 1985·No. C8-85-394·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

SUMMARY OPINION

LESLIE, Judge.

FACTS

Respondent John Biederstedt pleaded guilty to aggravated robbery, Minn.Stat. *85 § 609.245 (1982), of a convenience store in Willmar, Minnesota. In State v. Ritt, 363 N.W.2d 908 (Minn.Ct.App.1985), this court upheld the dispositional departure of Bied-erstedt’s accomplice in that same offense.

DECISION

The trial court based its departure on Biederstedt’s amenability to probation. As in Ritt, the record supports our determination that the court did not abuse its discretion in its departure. See State v. Olson, 325 N.W.2d 13 (Minn.1982); State v. Trog, 323 N.W.2d 28 (Minn.1982).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Biederstedt, 367 N.W.2d 84, 1985 Minn. App. LEXIS 4118 (Mich. Ct. App. 1985).

367 N.W.2d 84 (State v. Biederstedt) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Downey
454 N.W.2d 235 (Michigan Court of Appeals, 1990)
State v. Wenthold
427 N.W.2d 10 (Court of Appeals of Minnesota, 1988)
State v. Staten
390 N.W.2d 914 (Court of Appeals of Minnesota, 1986)