State v. Bidinost

644 N.E.2d 1389, 71 Ohio St. 3d 1467, 1995 Ohio LEXIS 384
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided February 15, 1995·No. 93-1667; No. 62925·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Reported at 71 Ohio St.3d 449, 644 N.E.2d 318. On motion for reconsideration and on motion to stay issuance of mandate. Motions denied.

Cook, J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Bidinost, 644 N.E.2d 1389, 71 Ohio St. 3d 1467, 1995 Ohio LEXIS 384 (Ohio 1995).

644 N.E.2d 1389 (State v. Bidinost) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. McLoughlin
723 A.2d 827 (Connecticut Superior Court, 1998)