State v. Bicanich
334 A.2d 17, 66 N.J. 557, 1975 N.J. LEXIS 234
Opinion
The judgment is affirmed substantially for the reasons expressed by the Appellate Division, 132 N. J. Super. 393.
For affirmance- — -Chief Justice Hughes, Justices Jacobs, Mountain, Sullivan, Pashman and Clifford and Judge Conford — 7.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Bicanich, 334 A.2d 17, 66 N.J. 557, 1975 N.J. LEXIS 234 (N.J. 1975).
334 A.2d 17 (State v. Bicanich) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Henry v. New Jersey Department of Human Services
9 A.3d 882 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 2010)
State v. Ramos
496 A.2d 386 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1985)
State v. Grossmick
379 A.2d 454 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1976)
State v. Carroll
334 A.2d 17 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1975)