State v. Bianchi

823 P.2d 1043, 111 Or. App. 408, 1992 Ore. App. LEXIS 383
CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon
DecidedFebruary 12, 1992
DocketC89-05-32780; CA A65872
StatusPublished

This text of 823 P.2d 1043 (State v. Bianchi) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Bianchi, 823 P.2d 1043, 111 Or. App. 408, 1992 Ore. App. LEXIS 383 (Or. Ct. App. 1992).

Opinion

PER CURIAM

In the probation revocation proceeding, we affirm the revocation. The state concedes that the minimum term imposed is invalid. We accept the concession, vacate the minimum term and remand for resentencing.

Probation revocatipn affirmed; minimum term vacated; remanded for resentencing.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
823 P.2d 1043, 111 Or. App. 408, 1992 Ore. App. LEXIS 383, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-bianchi-orctapp-1992.