State v. Bey

Ohio Supreme Court

State v. Bey

895 N.E.2d 568, 119 Ohio St. 3d 1506

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedOctober 30, 2008

Docket1997-2247

StatusPublished

This text of 895 N.E.2d 568 (State v. Bey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Bey, 895 N.E.2d 568, 119 Ohio St. 3d 1506 (Ohio 2008).

Pincite

Opinion

Lucas App. No. L-94-003. By entry filed July 21, 2008, this court ordered that appellant’s sentence be carried into execution on Wednesday, the 19th day of November, 2008. In order to facilitate this court’s timely consideration of any matters relating to the execution of appellant’s sentence,

It is ordered by the court that the Chief Justice may suspend application of any provisions of the Rules of Practice of the Supreme Court, including, but not limited to, the filing requirements imposed by S.CtPrac.R. XIV(l).

It is further ordered that service of documents as required by S.Ct.Prac.R. XIV(2) shall be personal, by facsimile transmission, or by email.

It is further ordered that counsel of record for the parties shall provide this court with a copy of any document relating to this matter that is filed in, or issued by, any other court in this state or any federal court, as well as any commutation, pardon, or warrant of reprieve issued by the Governor. A copy of the document shall be delivered to the Office of the Clerk as soon as possible, either personally, by facsimile transmission, or by email.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lucas App. No. L-94-003. By entry filed July 21, 2008, this court ordered that appellant’s sentence be carried into execution on Wednesday, the 19th day of November, 2008. In order to facilitate this court’s timely consideration of any matters relating to the execution of appellant’s sentence,

It is ordered by the court that the Chief Justice may suspend application of any provisions of the Rules of Practice of the Supreme Court, including, but not limited to, the filing requirements imposed by S.CtPrac.R. XIV(l).

It is further ordered that service of documents as required by S.Ct.Prac.R. XIV(2) shall be personal, by facsimile transmission, or by email.

It is further ordered that counsel of record for the parties shall provide this court with a copy of any document relating to this matter that is filed in, or issued by, any other court in this state or any federal court, as well as any commutation, pardon, or warrant of reprieve issued by the Governor. A copy of the document shall be delivered to the Office of the Clerk as soon as possible, either personally, by facsimile transmission, or by email.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

895 N.E.2d 568, 119 Ohio St. 3d 1506, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-bey-ohio-2008.