State v. Beverly

Ohio Supreme Court

State v. Beverly

998 N.E.2d 512, 137 Ohio St. 3d 1414

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedNovember 20, 2013

Docket2013-0827

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 998 N.E.2d 512 (State v. Beverly) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Beverly, 998 N.E.2d 512, 137 Ohio St. 3d 1414 (Ohio 2013).

Pincite

Opinion

Clark App. No. 2011 CA 64, 2013-Ohio-1365.

On motion for reconsideration. Motion granted and the discretionary appeal is accepted on Proposition of Law No. I only.

Lanzinger, J., concurs and would hold the cause for the decision in case Nos. 2013-1129 and 2013-1319, State v. Griffin, 2d Dist. Montgomery No. 24001, 2013-Ohio-2230. O’Connor, C.J., and O’Donnell, J., concur but would grant the motion as to both propositions of [1415]*1415law. Pfeifer, Kennedy, and French, JJ., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Clark App. No. 2011 CA 64, 2013-Ohio-1365.

On motion for reconsideration. Motion granted and the discretionary appeal is accepted on Proposition of Law No. I only.

Lanzinger, J., concurs and would hold the cause for the decision in case Nos. 2013-1129 and 2013-1319, State v. Griffin, 2d Dist. Montgomery No. 24001, 2013-Ohio-2230. O’Connor, C.J., and O’Donnell, J., concur but would grant the motion as to both propositions of [1415]*1415law. Pfeifer, Kennedy, and French, JJ., dissent.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

998 N.E.2d 512, 137 Ohio St. 3d 1414, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-beverly-ohio-2013.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack