State v. Beverly

Ohio Supreme Court

State v. Beverly

998 N.E.2d 512, 137 Ohio St. 3d 1414

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided November 20, 2013·No. 2013-0827·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Clark App. No. 2011 CA 64, 2013-Ohio-1365.

On motion for reconsideration. Motion granted and the discretionary appeal is accepted on Proposition of Law No. I only.

Lanzinger, J., concurs and would hold the cause for the decision in case Nos. 2013-1129 and 2013-1319, State v. Griffin, 2d Dist. Montgomery No. 24001, 2013-Ohio-2230. O’Connor, C.J., and O’Donnell, J., concur but would grant the motion as to both propositions of [1415] law. Pfeifer, Kennedy, and French, JJ., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Clark App. No. 2011 CA 64, 2013-Ohio-1365.

On motion for reconsideration. Motion granted and the discretionary appeal is accepted on Proposition of Law No. I only.

Lanzinger, J., concurs and would hold the cause for the decision in case Nos. 2013-1129 and 2013-1319, State v. Griffin, 2d Dist. Montgomery No. 24001, 2013-Ohio-2230. O’Connor, C.J., and O’Donnell, J., concur but would grant the motion as to both propositions of [1415] law. Pfeifer, Kennedy, and French, JJ., dissent.

State v. Beverly, 998 N.E.2d 512, 137 Ohio St. 3d 1414 (Ohio 2013).

Pincite

998 N.E.2d 512 (State v. Beverly) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related