State v. Betts

570 P.2d 114, 31 Or. App. 377, 1977 Ore. App. LEXIS 1986
CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon
DecidedOctober 24, 1977
DocketNo. 76A-2315, CA 8538
StatusPublished

This text of 570 P.2d 114 (State v. Betts) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Betts, 570 P.2d 114, 31 Or. App. 377, 1977 Ore. App. LEXIS 1986 (Or. Ct. App. 1977).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The defendant, having been convicted upon trial to the court of a traffic crime, appeals, contending there was no evidence sufficient to make a question of fact. The testimony of one of the witnesses, if believed, was sufficient to support a finding of guilty. The trial court apparently believed that witness.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
570 P.2d 114, 31 Or. App. 377, 1977 Ore. App. LEXIS 1986, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-betts-orctapp-1977.