State v. Betts

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Betts

576 S.W.3d 338

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Betts. Read the opinion of the Court — 559 S.W.3d 47 →

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided June 11, 2019·No. No. ED 106347·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

*339Christopher Eugene Betts (Appellant) appeals from the trial court's judgment entered after a jury found him guilty of sexual abuse in the first degree, felonious restraint, two counts of tampering with a victim/witness in a felony prosecution, and five counts of domestic assault in the second degree. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the trial court committed no reversible error. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Criminal Procedure 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

*339Christopher Eugene Betts (Appellant) appeals from the trial court's judgment entered after a jury found him guilty of sexual abuse in the first degree, felonious restraint, two counts of tampering with a victim/witness in a felony prosecution, and five counts of domestic assault in the second degree. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the trial court committed no reversible error. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Criminal Procedure 30.25(b).

State v. Betts, 576 S.W.3d 338 (Mo. Ct. App. 2019).

Pincite

576 S.W.3d 338 (State v. Betts) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.