State v. Bethell

Supreme Court of Louisiana

State v. Bethell

222 So. 2d 68, 254 La. 19, 1969 La. LEXIS 3000

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedMay 15, 1969

DocketNo. 49859

StatusPublished

This text of 222 So. 2d 68 (State v. Bethell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Bethell, 222 So. 2d 68, 254 La. 19, 1969 La. LEXIS 3000 (La. 1969).

Pincite

Opinion

In re: Thomas Bethell applying for writs of certiorari, prohibition and mandamus.

Application denied. The showing made does not warrant the exercise of our supervisory jurisdiction. On motion of the district attorney ad hoc appointed in this case and approved by a judge of the criminal district court, the fees and expenses of this prosecution are payable from the fund established by authority of Section 571:11 of Title 15 of the Revised Statutes of Louisiana.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re: Thomas Bethell applying for writs of certiorari, prohibition and mandamus.

Application denied. The showing made does not warrant the exercise of our supervisory jurisdiction. On motion of the district attorney ad hoc appointed in this case and approved by a judge of the criminal district court, the fees and expenses of this prosecution are payable from the fund established by authority of Section 571:11 of Title 15 of the Revised Statutes of Louisiana.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

222 So. 2d 68, 254 La. 19, 1969 La. LEXIS 3000, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-bethell-la-1969.