State v. Bethancorth
This text of 2020 ND 133 (State v. Bethancorth) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Dakota Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Filed 06/29/20 by Clerk of Supreme Court
IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
2020 ND 133
State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee v. Francisco Eugenio Bethancorth, Defendant and Appellant
No. 20200020
Appeal from the District Court of Dickey County, Southeast Judicial District, the Honorable Daniel D. Narum, Judge.
AFFIRMED.
Per Curiam.
Mary E. Depuydt, Special Assistant State’s Attorney, Wishek, ND, for plaintiff and appellee.
Benjamin C. Pulkrabek, Mandan, ND, for defendant and appellant. State v. Bethancorth No. 20200020
[¶1] Francisco Eugenio Bethancorth appeals from a criminal judgment entered after a jury found him guilty of criminal trespass. He argues his degree of intoxication prevented him from knowing that he was not licensed or privileged to enter or remain in a dwelling or highly secured premises, and the district court erred by denying his motion for acquittal. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(4).
[¶2] Jon J. Jensen, C.J. Daniel J. Crothers Jerod E. Tufte Lisa Fair McEvers Gerald W. VandeWalle
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2020 ND 133, 945 N.W.2d 250, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-bethancorth-nd-2020.