State v. Best

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Best

391 S.W.3d 498, 2013 WL 324265, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 125

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided January 29, 2013·No. No. WD 74798·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Ranee Best appeals from the trial court’s judgment convicting him of the class A misdemeanor of unlawful use of a weapon after a jury trial. In his sole point on appeal, Best contends that the trial court plainly erred in convicting and sentencing him because the State failed to prove an essential element of the offense, that Best used the firearm in either a negligent or unlawful manner. We affirm. Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Ranee Best appeals from the trial court’s judgment convicting him of the class A misdemeanor of unlawful use of a weapon after a jury trial. In his sole point on appeal, Best contends that the trial court plainly erred in convicting and sentencing him because the State failed to prove an essential element of the offense, that Best used the firearm in either a negligent or unlawful manner. We affirm. Rule 30.25(b).

State v. Best, 391 S.W.3d 498, 2013 WL 324265, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 125 (Mo. Ct. App. 2013).

Pincite

391 S.W.3d 498 (State v. Best) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.