State v. Besenyi

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Besenyi

499 S.W.3d 749, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 939, 2016 WL 5017975

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided September 20, 2016·No. WD 78891·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Robert Besenyi appeals his convictions and sentences for class D felony possession of burglar’s tools, section 569.180, RSMo 2000, class C misdemeanor attempted stealing, section 570.030, RSMo Cum. Supp. 2013, and class C misdemeanor trespass in the first degree, section 569.140, RSMo 2000. In his two points on appeal, he challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to support the possession of burglar’s tools and trespass conviction's. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties.

The judgment of convictions is affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Robert Besenyi appeals his convictions and sentences for class D felony possession of burglar’s tools, section 569.180, RSMo 2000, class C misdemeanor attempted stealing, section 570.030, RSMo Cum. Supp. 2013, and class C misdemeanor trespass in the first degree, section 569.140, RSMo 2000. In his two points on appeal, he challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to support the possession of burglar’s tools and trespass conviction's. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties.

The judgment of convictions is affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).

State v. Besenyi, 499 S.W.3d 749, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 939, 2016 WL 5017975 (Mo. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

499 S.W.3d 749 (State v. Besenyi) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.