State v. Besenyi

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Besenyi

499 S.W.3d 749, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 939, 2016 WL 5017975

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedSeptember 20, 2016

DocketWD 78891

StatusPublished

This text of 499 S.W.3d 749 (State v. Besenyi) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Besenyi, 499 S.W.3d 749, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 939, 2016 WL 5017975 (Mo. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Robert Besenyi appeals his convictions and sentences for class D felony possession of burglar’s tools, section 569.180, RSMo 2000, class C misdemeanor attempted stealing, section 570.030, RSMo Cum. Supp. 2013, and class C misdemeanor trespass in the first degree, section 569.140, RSMo 2000. In his two points on appeal, he challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to support the possession of burglar’s tools and trespass conviction's. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties.

The judgment of convictions is affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Robert Besenyi appeals his convictions and sentences for class D felony possession of burglar’s tools, section 569.180, RSMo 2000, class C misdemeanor attempted stealing, section 570.030, RSMo Cum. Supp. 2013, and class C misdemeanor trespass in the first degree, section 569.140, RSMo 2000. In his two points on appeal, he challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to support the possession of burglar’s tools and trespass conviction's. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties.

The judgment of convictions is affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

499 S.W.3d 749, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 939, 2016 WL 5017975, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-besenyi-moctapp-2016.