Home/Supreme Court of North Carolina/State v. Berry

State v. Berry

600 S.E.2d 856, 2004 N.C. LEXIS 856, 2004 WL 1638215
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Berry. Read the opinion of the Court — 356 N.C. 490 →
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided July 7, 2004·No. 389A01-3·Published

Opinion

600 S.E.2d 856 (2004)

STATE
v.
Kyle BERRY.

No. 389A01-3.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

July 7, 2004.

William F.W. Massengale, Chapel Hill, for Kyle Berry.

William N. Farrell, Special Deputy Attorney General, John Carriker, District Attorney, for State.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 6th day of July 2004 by Defendant to Extend Time for Court Reporters to Serve Transcript:

"Motion Allowed. Court reporter shall have up to and including the 30th day of August 2004 to serve transcript to counsel. By order of the Court in conference this the 7th day of July 2004."

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Berry, 600 S.E.2d 856, 2004 N.C. LEXIS 856, 2004 WL 1638215 (N.C. 2004).

600 S.E.2d 856 (State v. Berry) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.