State v. Berry

Supreme Court of Louisiana

State v. Berry

585 So. 2d 551, 1991 La. LEXIS 2582, 1991 WL 192135

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedSeptember 27, 1991

DocketNo. 91-KH-2133

StatusPublished

This text of 585 So. 2d 551 (State v. Berry) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Berry, 585 So. 2d 551, 1991 La. LEXIS 2582, 1991 WL 192135 (La. 1991).

Pincite

Opinion

DENNIS, J.,

concurs. Relator makes no showing that he attempted to comply with Local Rule 10 of the Rules of the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, before filing his petition in this Court. Relator should request the OIDP attorney handling OIDP cases in Section I to sign his pleading. If he is unsuccessful in his effort to obtain the signature to comply with Rule 10 and the Fourth Circuit subsequently refuses a resubmitted pro se petition for writ of ha-beas corpus, relator may then file his petition for writ of habeas corpus in this Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

DENNIS, J.,

concurs. Relator makes no showing that he attempted to comply with Local Rule 10 of the Rules of the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, before filing his petition in this Court. Relator should request the OIDP attorney handling OIDP cases in Section I to sign his pleading. If he is unsuccessful in his effort to obtain the signature to comply with Rule 10 and the Fourth Circuit subsequently refuses a resubmitted pro se petition for writ of ha-beas corpus, relator may then file his petition for writ of habeas corpus in this Court.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

585 So. 2d 551, 1991 La. LEXIS 2582, 1991 WL 192135, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-berry-la-1991.