State v. Berry

19 So. 3d 429, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 14105, 2009 WL 3012676
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 23, 2009·No. 3D09-448·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The State of Florida (“the State”) appeals Laffayette Berry’s (“the defendant”) downward departure sentence. We reverse.

Based on a review of the record, we find that there was no competent substantial evidence presented to support the downward departure sentence. See State v. Grayson, 916 So.2d 51, 53 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005) (finding that a trial court is required to find that, based on the evidence presented at the hearing, the defendant had a mental disorder that required specialized treatment; had a reasonable possibility of successful treatment; and required treat *430 ment that the Department of Corrections could not provide). Here, the trial court did not find that the Department of Corrections could not provide the treatment the defendant required.

Accordingly, we reverse and remand for further proceedings.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Berry, 19 So. 3d 429, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 14105, 2009 WL 3012676 (Fla. Ct. App. 2009).

19 So. 3d 429 (State v. Berry) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Grayson
916 So. 2d 51 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)