State v. Bernard

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Bernard

242 S.W.3d 478, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 34, 2008 WL 126509

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided January 15, 2008·No. WD 67033·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Nyree Bernard appeals her conviction, after a jury trial, for interference with custody, pursuant to Section 565.150. In her sole point on appeal, Bernard contends that the evidence was insufficient to show beyond a reasonable doubt that Bernard was guilty of the offense. A review of the record indicates that the State presented sufficient evidence from which a reasonable juror could find beyond a reasonable doubt that Bernard was guilty of the offense charged. Judgment affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Nyree Bernard appeals her conviction, after a jury trial, for interference with custody, pursuant to Section 565.150. In her sole point on appeal, Bernard contends that the evidence was insufficient to show beyond a reasonable doubt that Bernard was guilty of the offense. A review of the record indicates that the State presented sufficient evidence from which a reasonable juror could find beyond a reasonable doubt that Bernard was guilty of the offense charged. Judgment affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).

State v. Bernard, 242 S.W.3d 478, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 34, 2008 WL 126509 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).

Pincite

242 S.W.3d 478 (State v. Bernard) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.