State v. BERNACKI

4 A.3d 833, 298 Conn. 912, 2010 Conn. LEXIS 352
Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided September 15, 2010·No. SC 18674·Published

Opinion

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 122 Conn. App. 399 (AC 30176), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the defendant’s conviction of, and punishment for, both criminal possession of a firearm pursuant to General Statutes § 53a-217 (a) (3) (A), and criminal violation of a protective order pursuant to General Statutes § 53a-223 (a), did not violate double jeopardy?”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. BERNACKI, 4 A.3d 833, 298 Conn. 912, 2010 Conn. LEXIS 352 (Colo. 2010).

4 A.3d 833 (State v. BERNACKI) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. BERNACKI
998 A.2d 262 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 2010)