State v. Berkey
This text of 877 P.2d 1238 (State v. Berkey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Defendant appeals his conviction for sodomy in the first degree. ORS 163.405. We affirm his conviction without discussion and remand for entry of an amended judgment correcting the term of post-prison supervision.
Defendant challenges the imposition of a 15-year term of post-prison supervision pursuant to ORS 144.103, arguing that the correct term is three years. ORS 144.103 applies to sentencing for crimes that occurred after September 29, 1991,1 and the crime for which defendant was convicted occurred in 1990. Although defendant did not object to the post-prison supervision term, the state concedes that the error is apparent on the face of the record and should be corrected. We accept the state’s concession of error and agree that the error is apparent on the face of the record. We exercise our discretion to review the error, because the length of the post-prison supervision term exceeds that allowable by law, and justice would be served by correcting the error. We remand for entry of an amended judgment. Defendant need not be present for the entry of the amended judgment. State v. Lyons, 124 Or App 598, 863 P2d 1303 (1993), rev allowed 319 Or 406 (1994).
Conviction affirmed; remanded for entry of amended judgment.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
877 P.2d 1238, 129 Or. App. 398, 1994 Ore. App. LEXIS 1172, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-berkey-orctapp-1994.