State v. Bercaw

31 N.E. 798, 132 Ind. 260, 1892 Ind. LEXIS 56
CourtIndiana Supreme Court
DecidedSeptember 16, 1892
DocketNo. 16,555
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 31 N.E. 798 (State v. Bercaw) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Bercaw, 31 N.E. 798, 132 Ind. 260, 1892 Ind. LEXIS 56 (Ind. 1892).

Opinion

Elliott, J.

— The State seeks a decision of questions arising on the trial of the case in the court below, but there is no bill of exceptions in the record. It seems quite clear that where the questions arise on the trial and not upon the pleadings, there must be a bill of exceptions showing the rulings and the exceptions of the State. Elliott’s App. Proc., sections 276, 280. The stenographer’s report of the evidence brought into the transcript by the clerk is not a bill of exceptions. Such a report is not part of the record unless it is properly embodied in a bill of exceptions signed by the judge. See authorities cited in Elliott’s App. Proc., sections 821, 822.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Big Kanawha Co. v. Jones
45 Colo. 381 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1909)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
31 N.E. 798, 132 Ind. 260, 1892 Ind. LEXIS 56, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-bercaw-ind-1892.