State v. Bentley

280 P. 1038, 48 Idaho 191, 1929 Ida. LEXIS 32
CourtIdaho Supreme Court
DecidedSeptember 3, 1929
DocketNo. 5371.
StatusPublished

This text of 280 P. 1038 (State v. Bentley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Idaho Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Bentley, 280 P. 1038, 48 Idaho 191, 1929 Ida. LEXIS 32 (Idaho 1929).

Opinion

T. BAILEY LEE, J.

— The only direct evidence of the crime charged to defendant was the testimony of Arthur Killian, an admitted accomplice. There was no corroborative evidence tending to connect the defendant with the alleged crime. Judgment is therefore reversed and the cause remanded.

Budge, C. 'J., and Givens, Wm. E. Lee and Yarian, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
280 P. 1038, 48 Idaho 191, 1929 Ida. LEXIS 32, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-bentley-idaho-1929.