State v. Bentley Bootery, Inc.
30 A.2d 27, 129 N.J.L. 386, 1943 N.J. LEXIS 189
This text of 30 A.2d 27 (State v. Bentley Bootery, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
State v. Bentley Bootery, Inc., 30 A.2d 27, 129 N.J.L. 386, 1943 N.J. LEXIS 189 (N.J. 1943).
Opinion
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Chief Justice Brogan in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance —The Chancellor, Case, Bodine, Donges, Heher, Perskie, Colie, Dear, Wells, Rafferty, Hague, Thompson, JJ. 12.
For reversal —None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
State v. Muhammad
868 A.2d 302 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 2005)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
30 A.2d 27, 129 N.J.L. 386, 1943 N.J. LEXIS 189, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-bentley-bootery-inc-nj-1943.