State v. . Benthal
154 S.E. 916, 199 N.C. 808, 1930 N.C. LEXIS 268
This text of 154 S.E. 916 (State v. . Benthal) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
State v. . Benthal, 154 S.E. 916, 199 N.C. 808, 1930 N.C. LEXIS 268 (N.C. 1930).
Opinion
Tbe defendants were convicted upon an indictment charging them with the larceny of peanuts. From the sentence pronounced they appealed upon several assignments of error. We have considered each of the exceptions! and find no sufficient cause for granting a new trial.
No error.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
154 S.E. 916, 199 N.C. 808, 1930 N.C. LEXIS 268, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-benthal-nc-1930.