State v. Benson

322 S.W.3d 638, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 1352, 2010 WL 3971320
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided October 12, 2010·No. ED 93910·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Robert Benson appeals the judgment entered upon the trial court’s verdict convicting him of second-degree robbery. We find that the trial court did not err in denying Benson’s request to represent himself. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Benson, 322 S.W.3d 638, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 1352, 2010 WL 3971320 (Mo. Ct. App. 2010).

322 S.W.3d 638 (State v. Benson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Smith
322 S.W.3d 638 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2010)