State v. Bennett

169 S.E.2d 31, 5 N.C. App. 662, 1969 N.C. App. LEXIS 1422
Court of Appeals of North Carolina·Decided August 13, 1969·No. No. 6926SC363·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Morris, J.

All of defendant’s purported exceptions and assignments of error are to the charge of the court. However, the portions thereof assigned as error are not set out in the assignments of error, and no exceptions appear with respect thereto except under the purported assignments of error. The portions of the charge to which defendant takes exception are not identified in the record by letters, parentheses, or in any other manner. These purported assignments of error are ineffective to challenge the correctness of the charge. Vail v. Smith, 1 N.C. App. 498, 162 S.E. 2d 78; State v. Dunn, 264 N.C. 391, 141 S.E. 2d 630. For the reasons stated herein, the motion of the State to dismiss the appeal is well taken and is allowed.

Dismissed.

Campbell and BrocK, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Bennett, 169 S.E.2d 31, 5 N.C. App. 662, 1969 N.C. App. LEXIS 1422 (N.C. Ct. App. 1969).

169 S.E.2d 31 (State v. Bennett) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Larrimore
456 S.E.2d 789 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1995)
Yandle v. Yandle
193 S.E.2d 768 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1973)