State v. Bennett
106 So. 2d 443, 235 La. 987, 1958 La. LEXIS 1257
Opinion
Defendant appeals from a conviction of theft. LSA-R.S. 14:67.
Since the defendant perfected no bills of exception, and there being no error patent on the face of the record, there is nothing before us for review. State v. Richard, 230 La. 853, 89 So.2d 367; State v. Perez, 228 La. 796, 84 So.2d 195; State v. Scott, 227 La. 198, 78 So.2d 832; State v. Dartez, 222 La. 9, 62 So.2d 83; State v. McDonald, 218 La. 198, 48 So.2d 797.
The conviction and sentence are affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Bennett, 106 So. 2d 443, 235 La. 987, 1958 La. LEXIS 1257 (La. 1958).
106 So. 2d 443 (State v. Bennett) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Rockeymore
216 So. 2d 828 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1968)
State v. Brown
201 So. 2d 277 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1967)
State v. Marston
181 So. 2d 756 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1966)
State v. Sanford
181 So. 2d 50 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1965)
State v. Bowen
180 So. 2d 700 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1965)
State v. Cooper
131 So. 2d 55 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1961)