State v. Bennett

Supreme Court of Connecticut

State v. Bennett

338 A.2d 113, 168 Conn. 678

Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided June 3, 1975·Published

Opinion

The defendant’s. application to permit Attorney James Michael Merberg of the Massachusetts bar to appear pro hac vice is granted to the extent that Attorney Merberg is granted permission to participate in the preparation and argument of the appeal from the Superior Court in Hartford County subject to the presence and responsibility of a member of the Connecticut bar, as provided in § 15A of the Practice Book.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The defendant’s. application to permit Attorney James Michael Merberg of the Massachusetts bar to appear pro hac vice is granted to the extent that Attorney Merberg is granted permission to participate in the preparation and argument of the appeal from the Superior Court in Hartford County subject to the presence and responsibility of a member of the Connecticut bar, as provided in § 15A of the Practice Book.

State v. Bennett, 338 A.2d 113, 168 Conn. 678 (Colo. 1975).

Pincite

338 A.2d 113 (State v. Bennett) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.