State v. Benner

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Benner

873 S.W.2d 683, 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 675

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided April 19, 1994·No. Nos. 61593, 64018·Published

Opinion

[684]*684 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant was convicted of forcible sodomy, two counts of armed criminal action, and robbery in the first degree. Defendant filed appeals from the judgment and sentence and from the trial court’s denial, after an evidentiary hearing, of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. However, Defendant has abandoned the latter appeal by failing to brief any errors with respect to the denial of post-conviction relief.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record in this jury-tried case and find no error of law. An opinion would have no precedential value. We affirm the convictions pursuant to Rules 30.25(b) and 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[684]*684 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant was convicted of forcible sodomy, two counts of armed criminal action, and robbery in the first degree. Defendant filed appeals from the judgment and sentence and from the trial court’s denial, after an evidentiary hearing, of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. However, Defendant has abandoned the latter appeal by failing to brief any errors with respect to the denial of post-conviction relief.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record in this jury-tried case and find no error of law. An opinion would have no precedential value. We affirm the convictions pursuant to Rules 30.25(b) and 84.16(b).

State v. Benner, 873 S.W.2d 683, 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 675 (Mo. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

873 S.W.2d 683 (State v. Benner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.