State v. Benjamin

Supreme Court of Connecticut

State v. Benjamin

973 A.2d 660, 292 Conn. 912, 2009 Conn. LEXIS 316

CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut

DecidedJune 17, 2009

DocketSC 18390

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 973 A.2d 660 (State v. Benjamin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Benjamin, 973 A.2d 660, 292 Conn. 912, 2009 Conn. LEXIS 316 (Colo. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 114 Conn. App. 225 (AC 29170), is granted, limited to the foUowing issue:

“Did the Appellate Court properly decline to reach the merits of the defendant’s claims concerning one of two grounds on which the violation of probation finding was based, when the defendant requested a remand for resentencing based solely on the less serious, undisputed ground?”

McLACHLAN, J., did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 114 Conn. App. 225 (AC 29170), is granted, limited to the foUowing issue:

“Did the Appellate Court properly decline to reach the merits of the defendant’s claims concerning one of two grounds on which the violation of probation finding was based, when the defendant requested a remand for resentencing based solely on the less serious, undisputed ground?”

McLACHLAN, J., did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

973 A.2d 660, 292 Conn. 912, 2009 Conn. LEXIS 316, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-benjamin-conn-2009.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack