Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/State v. Benitez

State v. Benitez

93 So. 3d 1248, 2012 WL 3326610, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 13456
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedAugust 15, 2012
DocketNos. 3D11-474, 3D11-473, 3D11-467, 3D11-470
StatusPublished

This text of 93 So. 3d 1248 (State v. Benitez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Benitez, 93 So. 3d 1248, 2012 WL 3326610, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 13456 (Fla. Ct. App. 2012).

Opinion

ON CONFESSION OF ERROR

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of the defendants’ commendable and well-taken confession of error, the downward departure sentences entered below are vacated. See State v. Pita, 54 So.3d 557 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011); State v. Walters, 12 So.3d 298 (Fla. 3d DCA 2009); State v. Salgado, 948 So.2d 12 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006). The causes are remanded for further proceedings in which the defendants may elect whether to withdraw their pleas or be resenteneed within the guidelines. See Salgado, 948 So.2d at 18-19.

Vacated and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Walters
12 So. 3d 298 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2009)
State v. Salgado
948 So. 2d 12 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)
State v. PITA
54 So. 3d 557 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
93 So. 3d 1248, 2012 WL 3326610, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 13456, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-benitez-fladistctapp-2012.