State v. Below

Supreme Court of Louisiana

State v. Below

534 So. 2d 445, 1988 La. LEXIS 2582, 1988 WL 131344

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedDecember 9, 1988

DocketNo. 88-KK-2641

StatusPublished

This text of 534 So. 2d 445 (State v. Below) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Below, 534 So. 2d 445, 1988 La. LEXIS 2582, 1988 WL 131344 (La. 1988).

Pincite

Opinion

In re Below, Marilyn P.; — Defendant(s); applying for supervisory, remedial, and review; Parish of Natchitoches, 10th Judicial District Court, Div. “B”, No. 88-1349; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, No. KW88-0990.

Denied. With the case in its pre-trial stages, we find no clear abuse of discretion in the challenged rulings by the district court. Relator’s right is reserved to reurge admissibility of videotape in light of actual developments at trial.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Below, Marilyn P.; — Defendant(s); applying for supervisory, remedial, and review; Parish of Natchitoches, 10th Judicial District Court, Div. “B”, No. 88-1349; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, No. KW88-0990.

Denied. With the case in its pre-trial stages, we find no clear abuse of discretion in the challenged rulings by the district court. Relator’s right is reserved to reurge admissibility of videotape in light of actual developments at trial.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

534 So. 2d 445, 1988 La. LEXIS 2582, 1988 WL 131344, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-below-la-1988.