State v. Bellino

Supreme Court of Connecticut

State v. Bellino

628 A.2d 988, 226 Conn. 917, 1993 Conn. LEXIS 247

CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut

DecidedJuly 8, 1993

DocketSC 14802

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 628 A.2d 988 (State v. Bellino) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Bellino, 628 A.2d 988, 226 Conn. 917, 1993 Conn. LEXIS 247 (Colo. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 31 Conn. App. 385 (AC 10515), is granted, limited to the following issues:

“1. Whether the Appellate Court properly held that the instructions on self-defense, General Statutes § 53a-19, did not abuse the court’s discretion, where it did not instruct on the statutory duty to retreat and the limitations on that duty?

“2. Whether the Appellate Court properly held that the instructions on self-defense, relative to the [918]*918subjective-objective test employed by the jury in evaluating the degree of force used, were correct?”

The Supreme Court docket number is SC 14802. Lauren Weisfeld, assistant public defender, in support of the petition. Carolyn K. Longstreth, assistant state’s attorney, in opposition. Decided July 8, 1993

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 31 Conn. App. 385 (AC 10515), is granted, limited to the following issues:

“1. Whether the Appellate Court properly held that the instructions on self-defense, General Statutes § 53a-19, did not abuse the court’s discretion, where it did not instruct on the statutory duty to retreat and the limitations on that duty?

“2. Whether the Appellate Court properly held that the instructions on self-defense, relative to the [918]*918subjective-objective test employed by the jury in evaluating the degree of force used, were correct?”

The Supreme Court docket number is SC 14802. Lauren Weisfeld, assistant public defender, in support of the petition. Carolyn K. Longstreth, assistant state’s attorney, in opposition. Decided July 8, 1993

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

628 A.2d 988, 226 Conn. 917, 1993 Conn. LEXIS 247, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-bellino-conn-1993.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack