State v. Bell

855 P.2d 669, 121 Or. App. 659, 1993 Ore. App. LEXIS 1168
Court of Appeals of Oregon·Decided July 14, 1993·No. 90C-20539; CA A74244·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Defendant pleaded guilty to robbery in the first degree, ORS 164.415, robbery in the second degree, ORS 164.405, and burglary in the first degree. ORS 164.225. After determining the presumptive sentence for each charge under the sentencing guidelines, the court found defendant to be a dangerous offender and imposed a 30-year sentence under ORS 161.725. On the robbery in the first degree and the burglary charges, the court also imposed a mandatory minimum term of incarceration under ORS 144.110. The court “merged” the two robbery charges for sentencing.

Defendant argues that the court erred by imposing minimum terms under ORS 144.110. The state concedes that the court erred. State v. Serhienko, 111 Or App 604, 826 P2d 114 (1992). We accept that concession.1

Convictions affirmed; remanded for resentencing on robbery in the first degree and burglary in the first degree.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Bell, 855 P.2d 669, 121 Or. App. 659, 1993 Ore. App. LEXIS 1168 (Or. Ct. App. 1993).

855 P.2d 669 (State v. Bell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Serhienko
826 P.2d 114 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1992)
State v. Adams
847 P.2d 397 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1993)