State v. Bell

2016 Ohio 7560, 78 N.E.3d 830, 150 Ohio St. 3d 23
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided November 2, 2016·No. No. 2015-1893·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

{¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority of State v. Jones, 148 Ohio St.3d 167, 2016-Ohio-5105, 69 N.E.3d 688, with respect to the issues raised in the appeal, and on the authority of State v. Thomas, 148 Ohio St.3d 248, 2016-Ohio-5567, 70 N.E.3d 496, with respect to the issues raised in the cross-appeal.

O’Connor, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lanzinger, French, and O’Neill, JJ., concur. Timothy J. McGinty, Cuyahoga County Prosecuting Attorney, and Daniel T. Van, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee and cross-appellant. Robert L. Tobik, Cuyahoga County Public Defender, and Erika B. Cunliffe, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant and cross-appellee. O’Donnell and Kennedy, JJ., concur with respect to the appeal, dissent with respect to the cross-appeal, and would reinstate the sentence imposed by the trial court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Bell, 2016 Ohio 7560, 78 N.E.3d 830, 150 Ohio St. 3d 23 (Ohio 2016).

2016 Ohio 7560 (State v. Bell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Bell (Slip Opinion)
2016 Ohio 7560 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2016)