State v. Bell

Ohio Supreme Court

State v. Bell

2016 Ohio 7560, 78 N.E.3d 830, 150 Ohio St. 3d 23

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedNovember 2, 2016

DocketNo. 2015-1893

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 2016 Ohio 7560 (State v. Bell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Bell, 2016 Ohio 7560, 78 N.E.3d 830, 150 Ohio St. 3d 23 (Ohio 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

{¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority of State v. Jones, 148 Ohio St.3d 167, 2016-Ohio-5105, 69 N.E.3d 688, with respect to the issues raised in the appeal, and on the authority of State v. Thomas, 148 Ohio St.3d 248, 2016-Ohio-5567, 70 N.E.3d 496, with respect to the issues raised in the cross-appeal.

O’Connor, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lanzinger, French, and O’Neill, JJ., concur. Timothy J. McGinty, Cuyahoga County Prosecuting Attorney, and Daniel T. Van, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee and cross-appellant. Robert L. Tobik, Cuyahoga County Public Defender, and Erika B. Cunliffe, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant and cross-appellee. O’Donnell and Kennedy, JJ., concur with respect to the appeal, dissent with respect to the cross-appeal, and would reinstate the sentence imposed by the trial court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

{¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority of State v. Jones, 148 Ohio St.3d 167, 2016-Ohio-5105, 69 N.E.3d 688, with respect to the issues raised in the appeal, and on the authority of State v. Thomas, 148 Ohio St.3d 248, 2016-Ohio-5567, 70 N.E.3d 496, with respect to the issues raised in the cross-appeal.

O’Connor, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lanzinger, French, and O’Neill, JJ., concur. Timothy J. McGinty, Cuyahoga County Prosecuting Attorney, and Daniel T. Van, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee and cross-appellant. Robert L. Tobik, Cuyahoga County Public Defender, and Erika B. Cunliffe, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant and cross-appellee. O’Donnell and Kennedy, JJ., concur with respect to the appeal, dissent with respect to the cross-appeal, and would reinstate the sentence imposed by the trial court.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2016 Ohio 7560, 78 N.E.3d 830, 150 Ohio St. 3d 23, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-bell-ohio-2016.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack