State v. Bell

889 N.E.2d 1020, 118 Ohio St. 3d 447
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided July 2, 2008·No. No. 2008-0618·Published

Opinion

{¶ 1} The discretionary appeal is accepted on Proposition of Law No. I.

{¶ 2} The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed as to the court of appeals’ holding on appellant’s first assignment of error below on the authority of State v. Cabrales, 118 Ohio St.3d 54, 2008-Ohio-1625, 886 N.E.2d 181. The cause is remanded to the trial court for further proceedings consistent with State v. Cabrales, including a determination as to whether the offenses were committed with a separate animus under R.C. 2941.25(B).

Moyer, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, and Cupp, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Bell, 889 N.E.2d 1020, 118 Ohio St. 3d 447 (Ohio 2008).

889 N.E.2d 1020 (State v. Bell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Cabrales
886 N.E.2d 181 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2008)