State v. Bell
206 S.E.2d 356, 22 N.C. App. 348, 1974 N.C. App. LEXIS 2327
Opinion
Defendant’s only assignment of error is that the court erred in denying his motion for nonsuit. Defendant contends there was no evidence from which the jury could infer that defendant “wrongfully broke or entered the building in question.” This contention is without merit. The evidence was clearly sufficient to take the case to the jury.
*350 No error.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Bell, 206 S.E.2d 356, 22 N.C. App. 348, 1974 N.C. App. LEXIS 2327 (N.C. Ct. App. 1974).
206 S.E.2d 356 (State v. Bell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. McVay
606 S.E.2d 145 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2004)