State v. Bell
206 S.E.2d 356, 22 N.C. App. 348, 1974 N.C. App. LEXIS 2327
CourtCourt of Appeals of North Carolina
DecidedJuly 3, 1974
Docket7426SC540
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases
This text of 206 S.E.2d 356 (State v. Bell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
State v. Bell, 206 S.E.2d 356, 22 N.C. App. 348, 1974 N.C. App. LEXIS 2327 (N.C. Ct. App. 1974).
Opinion
Defendant’s only assignment of error is that the court erred in denying his motion for nonsuit. Defendant contends there was no evidence from which the jury could infer that defendant “wrongfully broke or entered the building in question.” This contention is without merit. The evidence was clearly sufficient to take the case to the jury.
*350 No error.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
State v. McVay
606 S.E.2d 145 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2004)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
206 S.E.2d 356, 22 N.C. App. 348, 1974 N.C. App. LEXIS 2327, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-bell-ncctapp-1974.