State v. Belew

Ohio Supreme Court

State v. Belew

13 N.E.3d 1185, 139 Ohio St. 3d 1495

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedAugust 4, 2014

Docket2013-0711

StatusPublished

This text of 13 N.E.3d 1185 (State v. Belew) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Belew, 13 N.E.3d 1185, 139 Ohio St. 3d 1495 (Ohio 2014).

Pincite

Opinion

Lucas App. No. L-ll-1279, 2013-Ohio-1078. This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing of the motion for admission pro hac vice of Brockton D. Hunter. It is ordered by the court that the motion is granted. Pursuant to Gov.Bar R. XII(4), counsel shall file a notice of permission to appear pro hac vice with the Supreme Court’s Office of Attorney Services within 30 days of the date of this entry.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lucas App. No. L-ll-1279, 2013-Ohio-1078. This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing of the motion for admission pro hac vice of Brockton D. Hunter. It is ordered by the court that the motion is granted. Pursuant to Gov.Bar R. XII(4), counsel shall file a notice of permission to appear pro hac vice with the Supreme Court’s Office of Attorney Services within 30 days of the date of this entry.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

13 N.E.3d 1185, 139 Ohio St. 3d 1495, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-belew-ohio-2014.