State v. Bedford
This text of 9 A.3d 659 (State v. Bedford) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Rhode Island primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
This case came before the Court in conference pursuant to the state’s confession of error. The state indicates its agreement with the attorney for the defendant Normand Bedford that the defendant was denied his Sixth Amendment right to counsel during his closing argument at trial and that consequently his convictions and the sentences imposed thereon should be vacated and the case remanded to the Superior Court for a new trial. Counsel for the defendant joins in the state’s confession of error and moves this Court to admit the defendant to bail forthwith in the event of this Court’s acceptance thereof. After careful consideration thereof, this Court concludes that the confession of error should be accepted. Accordingly, the petition for certiorari is granted, the judgment of conviction and sentences imposed on the defendant are vacated, and the case is remanded to the Superior Court for a new trial. The defendant’s motion for bail is denied without prejudice and may be renewed in the trial court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
9 A.3d 659, 2010 WL 5541650, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-bedford-ri-2010.