State v. Becker
This text of 234 P.2d 900 (State v. Becker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Washington Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This is a companion case to State v. Becker, ante p. 94.
Defendant, Gust Becker, was charged by information with aiding and abetting grand larceny by false representation in that he aided and abetted Pauline Becker in obtaining old-age assistance grants by fraudulent representations.
Defendant filed a motion to quash the information primarily on the ground that the information did not charge him with aiding and abetting the commission of the crime of grand larceny. After hearing argument, the trial court entered an order granting defendant’s motion and dismissing the action. From that order, the state appeals.
Counsel for the respective parties filed in this court a stipulation that our decision in State v. Becker, supra, should be determinative of the instant case.
Accordingly, for the reasons stated therein, the order of the trial court in this case is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
234 P.2d 900, 39 Wash. 2d 959, 1951 Wash. LEXIS 366, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-becker-wash-1951.