State v. Becker

Court of Appeals of Oregon

State v. Becker

851 P.2d 1150, 120 Or. App. 230, 1993 Ore. App. LEXIS 709

CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon

DecidedMay 12, 1993

DocketCF91-345; CA A72459

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 851 P.2d 1150 (State v. Becker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Becker, 851 P.2d 1150, 120 Or. App. 230, 1993 Ore. App. LEXIS 709 (Or. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Defendant pled guilty to assault in the first degree, ORS 163.185, assault in the second degree, ORS 163.175, and burglary in the first degree, ORS 164.225, pursuant to an agreement in which the state dismissed a charge of attempted murder. ORS 161.405; ORS 163.115. Defendant makes two challenges to the sentences imposed. On the assault in the second degree charge, he argues that the crime seriousness level was 8 and that the court sentenced him at level 9. On the consecutive sentences imposed, he argues that the court failed to comply with OAR 253-12-020 by not imposing sentence according to criminal history column I.

Defendant asks that we review his claims as errors of law apparent on the face of the record under ORS 138.222(4). In State v. Adams, 315 Or 359, 847 P2d 397 (1993), the Supreme Court held that a sentence resulting from an agreement between a defendant and the state is not reviewable on appeal. In the Petition to Enter Plea of Guilty here, defendant stipulated to “categories H, 10, 9, 9, for [an] approximate sentence of 98-103 months.” Defendant’s sentence here is 101 months, within his agreement. ORS 138.222 precludes review of his sentence resulting from the plea agreement. State v. Johnston, 120 Or App 165, 851 P2d 1156 (1993).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM

Defendant pled guilty to assault in the first degree, ORS 163.185, assault in the second degree, ORS 163.175, and burglary in the first degree, ORS 164.225, pursuant to an agreement in which the state dismissed a charge of attempted murder. ORS 161.405; ORS 163.115. Defendant makes two challenges to the sentences imposed. On the assault in the second degree charge, he argues that the crime seriousness level was 8 and that the court sentenced him at level 9. On the consecutive sentences imposed, he argues that the court failed to comply with OAR 253-12-020 by not imposing sentence according to criminal history column I.

Defendant asks that we review his claims as errors of law apparent on the face of the record under ORS 138.222(4). In State v. Adams, 315 Or 359, 847 P2d 397 (1993), the Supreme Court held that a sentence resulting from an agreement between a defendant and the state is not reviewable on appeal. In the Petition to Enter Plea of Guilty here, defendant stipulated to “categories H, 10, 9, 9, for [an] approximate sentence of 98-103 months.” Defendant’s sentence here is 101 months, within his agreement. ORS 138.222 precludes review of his sentence resulting from the plea agreement. State v. Johnston, 120 Or App 165, 851 P2d 1156 (1993).

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

851 P.2d 1150, 120 Or. App. 230, 1993 Ore. App. LEXIS 709, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-becker-orctapp-1993.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack